Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UKFast
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Tim Vickers (talk) 01:50, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- UKFast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Hosting provider written up by an SPA. Are they notable? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 09:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep They may be notable (the Google test shows approx. 146k+ hits) but the article is written very POV. So I'd say keep after NPOVing. So#Why 09:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep per above. I went ahead and stubbified it to remove POVness, so it's probably worth keeping now. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.